|Table of Content „The Beginnings”| |The Beginnings (2)|
The Beginnings (1) – The First Step of the Energy (28.01.2015 / 2017)
|Începuturile (1) – Primul pas al energiei)|
Certainly, in the beginning, there was nothing. Just darkness. Then there was what the scientists call the „Big Bang”. Others say that, at that time, the Divine Power made light and I had to deal with the „God Bang” (the „God Word” – “Fiat Lux”). And then He made the sky with the stars and the earth with everything that composes it.
It doesn’t matter how much time has passed since then. Scientists have estimated that 13.7 billion years (or 13.8 billion years) have passed since the Big Bang. People of „religion” say that everything „happened” a maximum of 7,000 years ago. I will not limit myself to these details because, anyway, it was a start, a beginning…
From this moment on, space and time appeared and, thus, „everything was set in motion”. And, of course, from this moment came the energy from which, later, the matter will appear, all the matter that composes the universe known and unknown to us being a real explosion of space and not an explosion in space.
In the case of the Divine Power, things were much simpler because, from the beginning, everything was done (no matter how many days). Scientists say that every point in space was involved in this „Big Bang” or „God Bang”, wherever you were when you had nowhere else to be but inside this space, the „Big Bang” / the „God Bang”.
How did the scientists come to this conclusion: that there was a big explosion?!? Simple. They know certain things such as the speed of light and, with its help, they „look” through time.
The most distant galaxies are 13.7 billion light-years away, and so we see the past in this way. That’s because the light needs 13.7 billion years to reach us (from the emission point to the receiving point). The earliest times, due to the time it takes for light to reach us, become the new contemporary time.
Thus we see the history of everything around us, from astral bodies. Even the light that leaves the Sun takes more than 8 minutes to reach us, and the Sun that we see is 8 minutes ago.
Thus, looking more and more towards the edges of the universe we already see a film of what happened then, elder and elder. Thus, just as a film is given back, scientists knew (have power) to unfold (rewind) the events of evolution after the „great explosion” to discover when this time was: 13.7 – 13.8 billion years.
The others, the „worshipers” took the holy books and it was not difficult for them to turn back in a similar effort by accumulating generations of biblical characters (similar to other cults) to discover this „original” moment.
But this act, of giving the film back, was for scientists only the first step. They discovered that, given that the great explosion started from nothing, from a single extremely small point, it happened in its entirety, of the universe.
Yes, it sounds weird, „A point as the size of a universe.” Or, moreover, „From absolutely nothing to the whole universe”. And the universe is so vast that, for our mind, it’s hard to imagine. 400 billion galaxies. Distributed in the Universe described by the size of 150 billion light-years. Also, we cannot fail to notice a great similarity with „everything was done at once,” as those who give the Divine Powers the righteousness of everything that is and has been done.
At that time it seems that the laws that govern our universe have begun to manifest, starting with gravity. Why is it just?!? Scientists have come to a consensus that tends to become unanimous: gravity is an effect of space-time distortion (of the manifestations of its equilibrium).
We don’t know how long it was then but we know how much it is now. It is exactly „as it should be” because it is born by the very manifestation of the universe itself as a direct evolution of transformation, as a balance compensation (and, from what you will read in the following posts, it also comes from the surrounding layers of our universe included in the quantum multiverse).
If it were less everything would have been without form, without stars, galaxies and what we know is that it is in the universe, because the „explosive expansion” would have continued. And if there was more, a little more than it is now, everything would have gone to a black hole universe. But it is exactly as it should be because the space-time distortions that give birth to gravity are those born of the universe itself in the compensatory balance.
Strange coincidence, isn’t it? Everything seems so well directed that it is difficult to exclude a divine manifestation, a „God Bang” or „Big God” (or, at least, to accept the translation of the holographic principle in all considerations, as you will see in the following posts).
But, if nothing has become all, why is there talk of the Big Bang? Scientists speculate that a fraction of a second from the start of this Big Bang followed a huge explosion in the form of a shock wave of energy (of course) that extended the universe in all directions at an incredible speed, well above the limit speed of our universe represented by the speed of light (300,000 km/s).
Maybe the time was different from what it’s now. Then, to explain this, they needed to „invent” a new unit of measure for time, called “Plank Time”.
Thus, in a second, as we know it, there are more Plank units of time than all the seconds that have passed since the Big Bang. This concept, even according to the scientists, „makes human intuition useless”.
Wouldn’t it be easier if they were paying attention to their statements about space-time distortions and accepting that there was no time, then, in the „Plank area”? Or, at least, to accept that the universe was already everything, the whole, what is now, at least energetically, as the „worshipers” claim?!?
After all, at this starting point, called the „Great Explosion”, everything was energy, and later, in its evolution towards „everything”, all energy remained, the ratio of any kind of space-time having no time component. Yes, the statement is strange but, in my opinion, there was no time, one that gives meaning, value, and existence to the current Universe. But for now, it’s OK with this Plank Time.
Thus, within a few moments Plank was born the universe as we know it as its dimension, but not as a „look”. According to scientists, it was, at first, only a „raging” storm of overheated energy (although „overheated” has no meaning because it is all about energy – heat is the manifestation of energy, and so on, possibly accepting their arguments only in comparison with a maximum thermal level that can be found in the current universe, current today).
But, they come and complete with the fact that as the universe „expanded” to its current dimensions, it cooled down. And this cooling has led to the next steps in transforming the universe from a mass of „raging energy” into what we know now.
The first step in this transformation was the appearance of energy aggregations and, implicitly, the appearance of subatomic particles (but which still have no mass). Only now can we talk about some kind of the first form of matter in the universe.
About this form of manifestation of matter Albert Einstein „talked about”, years before anyone spoke about the Big Bang, in his famous formula „energy = mass multiplied by the square of the speed of light”.
Above all, energy can be converted into mass (of course, and vice versa), and, in the continuity of reasoning, energy has given the possibility of the mass of the universe to appear.
From my point of view (and many researchers), this equation assumes that there is no Plank time (in fact, there is no time) because there is „speed of light” (which has its “time content” being an expression defined by „meters per second”, so it cannot exist without time – so time will appear later or the universe was already everything?!?).
There is also a scientific, intuitive explanation, which states that it is not possible to „discuss” at this moment of distance but only time (be it Plank Time) because, of course, every point of the expanding space was „there”, without physically moving.
Only space moves to its dimensions. So the lack of mass of subatomic particles existing at this time and the lack of distance and time to „justify” the speed of light leads us to the conclusion that the initial energy of the universe was „zero” (any of the „elements” of Einstein’s famous formula being zero results that the energy of the universe, even at this moment of creation, is zero … !!! Also, a „something” without mass can only have the speed of light, so mass is needed for a „something” to „slow down” and be something other than light.).
In short, it is either accepted that the universe already had the full dimensions, it was „everything”, or it is accepted that time appeared from this moment, of the appearance of matter (but for this the universe was at its „everything” dimension).
From what I will present in the following posts, it will be seen that this is a universe with a holographic manifestation, in which touching the layers (multiverse) „surrounding” our universe attracted the instantaneous appearance of the universe known to us by simple holographic, instantaneous translation.
But, in a layered structure of the multiverse, it is obvious that the initial universe layer is reached and thus all the considerations of the scientists would be applicable at least for it (see also the following posts). But let’s return, leaving aside details like the absence of time!
In those „moments” the universe didn’t look as far away as we now know because there were no atoms. It also looked like a kind of energy soup in which energy became matter (in the form of aggregations that formed subatomic particles) and matter became energy (against the background of instability given by too much energy content, content that thermally „dissolves” the subatomic particles that are formed, in a sort of „appears-disappears” game).
As you will see in the following posts, the subatomic world is a world in continuous manifestation (and, implicitly, in change) where subatomic particles at high energies produce instantaneous position translations depending on the manifestations of the quark particles that compose them, changing them, both the position and the „form of manifestation/existence” (proton becoming neutron or electron, etc.).
Therefore, it was necessary to cool (the decrease of the „thermal / energy content”) to proceed to the next step, the one represented by the „stabilization” of the subatomic particles and, subsequently, the appearance of the atoms.
Cooling to be understood as translating, „investing” energy into something, possible only through investing in the matter, something else not existing subsequently. So, the first „born” step of this cooling, against the background of „occurrence” and existence of subatomic nuclear particles, was represented by the emergence of nuclear „strong force”.
At this moment occur, a scientific concept enunciated in 1979 by Alan Guth, that of the theory of inflation. Factually, wherever we look in the universe, we find that there is an identical number of stars, galaxies, or formations similar to those that exist exactly on the opposite side, regardless of the direction in which we look.
Of course, no one explains why this distribution exists. It is as if a „line” of the universe comes into contact with the opposite, symmetrical „line” (identical in terms of structure, composition, etc.) in a central, „balance” point.
This is were the inflation that underlies the beginning of the „immense development” reported in time, like an explosion of the space „that brought chaos to order”, that order „in the mirror” found now by scientists.
Now, gravity (a direct result of space-time distortions and the influence of the external universal layers of the multiverse) manifests itself „distorted”, incipiently, determining the distribution of matter in the universe we have today, gravitational waves can be „detected” (even if not visualized) by studying the microwave background of the space and „noticing the distribution of matter in the universe”.
There would be something more to say about the inflation theory. Once the universe’s inflation is „started”, it can only be stopped in a place called by scientists „a new universe”. Something like, when inflation will stop, a new universe opens up (from what you can understand from the posts that follow you will see that there will be touch with one of the layers adjacent to our universe, layers of the multiverse, and it will realize the „inflation” energy discharge in a new big-bang, one of the universes that will „start” its development then). Given the current discoveries of quantum physics related to the multiverse, this becomes somewhat unanimously accepted. But, about that, a little later.
And that’s what happened, it „passed” the first order after the „perfect order”. Thus, the subatomic particles no longer „changed” into energy (they didn’t return to their initial state).
Now is the „time” when it is “proposed” that particles begin to have mass due to an interaction with a hypothetical „Higgs field” (after the name of the researcher, Peter Higgs, who launched this hypothesis in the 1960s – the „finding” of the Higgs boson being the basic element that confirmed this theory). In my opinion (and others) is nothing more than a direct transformation effect, something that already existed „as is”, possibly, at most, being a direct effect of the interaction with the dark matter or a compensatory component for space-time distortions.
It is only certain that the „action” of this particle has led to the appearance of mass and, implicitly, the appearance of atomic particles that attract the formation of the first atoms and, implicitly, of matter as we know it now.
Maybe that’s why, in the physicist’s world, the Higgs boson was called the „God particle”. Or maybe, because the Higgs boson caused the initial super-force imbalance, before the Big Bang (an imbalance that caused the „Big Bang”)?!?
But then what do we do with Plank Time?!? Does it still have any real meaning or do we „hold” it forcibly to have a „historical explanation” scientific substrate.
And thus, here, at this moment, appeared the „weak force” and the electromagnetic forces began to manifest because the „seeds of matter” appeared (as it exists, it manifests and evolves at this moment). Thus the balance of the four forces that formed and govern the present universe was achieved: the weak force, the strong (nuclear) force, the electromagnetism, and the gravity.
The researchers say that, at this point, the „titanic battle” between matter and antimatter began and, in their opinion, the cancellation of most of the „matter” elements that existed at that time. Given that everything was energy and the terms „matter” and „antimatter” are (with certainty) prematurely used, it is obvious that the meaning of „discussions” is quite different.
Also, it is unanimously accepted by scientists that the „structure” of subatomic particles (in their current manifestation) is represented by energy quants (hence the term „quantum physics”), or energy strings.
These are energetic manifestations (given by space-time distortion – ?!?) whose vibration (manifestation in the form of a string, of a vibrating energy line) depends on which subatomic particle results. If this string has a certain vibration it becomes quark, another vibration gives a proton, if it has another vibration it becomes a neutron, and so on in the manifestations of an electron, meson, tachyon, boson and how many particles are known and unknown at this time. So, by deduction, it is obvious that matter is „delimited” (defined, or any other similar term) by a form of energy vibration, similar (or „in the mirror”) to the „delimitation” of antimatter.
For a better understanding of my „descriptions”, further, in the documentation I will make, I will also use the term „quants” of energy even if it is correctly descriptive and that of „strings/energy strings”. That’s because, in essence, it’s about a quantum of energy. Let’s go back!
In their descriptions, scientists tell us that contact between matter and antimatter results in the cancellation of matter and antimatter with a large (huge) release of energy.
But at least I can’t help but notice the nonsense of the statement. The matter is energy, antimatter is energy, they are canceled upon „contact” and result in energy. Am I right with nonsense?!?
Going further on the reasoning of scientists, for example, an atom has a content called the nucleus, of final resultant charge (the sum of the potentials of the subatomic particles that compose it) which is positive and which permanently „seeks” a negative charge in the form of an electron to achieve equilibrium (possibly coupling with another atom to compensate for the lack of the electron or electrons needed to achieve balance).
There would be an „interesting nuance” to comment on. What does „positive load” mean and „negative load”?!?
Based on minimal knowledge of atomic physics (possibly quantum physics), you will „perceive” that the electron (subatomic particle, lepton, fundamental – meaning that no components or substrates of it are known) is/constitutes „negative electric charge”.
The electrons „orbit” around the atomic nucleus where all the other known subatomic particles are located. Another „property” of them is that they can „leave” (quite easily) the respective atom (from which they „belong”) without affecting the „belonging” to the respective atom (the chemical element), determining only the possibility, that atom, of „coupling into molecules” or with other atoms, forming different chemicals (determining the chemical properties).
Now come interesting details about these electrons. Being fermions (belonging to the first generation of the lepton particle family), two electrons cannot occupy the same quantum state, following the Paul principle, of exclusion. Then, like all elementary particles, they are both particle and wave (you already know, especially from previous posts, about water).
For this reason, electrons play an essential role in many physical phenomena, such as electricity, magnetism, chemistry, and thermal conductivity, also participating in the gravitational, electromagnetic, and „weak force” interactions.
Since the electron has a charge, it has an „environmental” electric field, its motion also determining a magnetic field. So, we’re talking about an electromagnetic field, under the conditions of motion. The magnetic fields produced from other sources will interact in the motion of an electron, according to Lorentz law.
Finally, it should be remembered that electrons, when accelerated, radiate, or absorb energy in the form of photons.
Within the limits of experimental accuracy, the charge of an electron is equal to the charge of a proton (but of opposite sign).
The physicists have delimited that the positive electric charge would be given by the proton, which is/constitutes the „positive electric charge”, is a subatomic particle, a component of the nucleus (it is a nucleon, classified as a hadron, like neutrons), however not being a „fundamental particle” (although, spontaneously, there are no free protons, „proving that this is a stable particle”).
Moreover, the number of protons in the atomic nucleus is known as the „atomic number”, which determines the chemical element to which the atom belongs. Variations in the number of protons, even if not all the atoms of an element are necessarily identical (isomers and isotopes, including protonated molecules or, as they are known, Bronsted acids), cause different behavior to the reference chemical element.
The free proton, which is not bound to nucleons or electrons, is a stable particle that has not been observed to decompose spontaneously into particles. But, for a proton to be naturally free, an energy-filled environment is needed where temperatures are high enough to separate protons from electrons, for which they have a certain affinity. Thus, free protons exist in plasma, which has a temperature too high to allow protons to combine with electrons. Free protons of high energy and velocity make up 90% of the cosmic rays.
Therefore, under the „usual” environment conditions of nature and human achievements, the negative electric charge means plus electrons, positive means minus electrons (because protons streams cannot be discussed under the conditions described).
In the „advantage” of the aforementioned, it can be presented that the ratio between the mass of a proton to that of an electron is about 1836 (the proton has a mass greater than the electron 1836 times). The astronomical measurements show that the ratio of proton-electron mass retained the same value, as provided in the „standard model”, for at least half the age of the universe.
We will continue tomorrow, so that’s enough.
Love, Gratitude, and Understanding!
Dorin, Merticaru
|Table of Content „The Beginnings”| |The Beginnings (2)|
dorinm 